Appendix D

 CUDCP Policies

 

The Definition of Clinical Psychology was adopted jointly in 1990 by CUDCP and Division 12. 

Minutes of the February 1992 Meeting 

CUDCP commitment "to participation on the APA COA be limited to a period not to exceed three years. Prior to the conclusion of that period ... undertake a review ... focus specifically on the degree to which COA procedures and activities support and encourage the education of clinical psychologists within curricula whose didactic and experiential components provide a solid foundation in, and lifelong valuing of, the scientific and scholarly bases of the discipline."

 Minutes of the February 1993 Meeting

 "CUDCP recognizes that the Accreditation Summit Steering Committee has articulated important principles and values regarding the evaluation of scientist-practitioner programs. We encourage further discussion and development of these principles." 

CUDCP Committee to evaluate APA's new COA recommended that CUDCP consider the following when evaluating the adequacy of the COA over the next two years:

  1.   COA's independence from APA

  2. Degree to which new criteria emphasize truth in. advertising, evaluation of training outcomes, and empirical bases for the assessment and treatment procedures taught in programs.

  3. Adequacy of COA's reports on its decisions and the bases for those decisions.

 "CUDCP endorses the policy statement of the National Conference on Scientist-Practitioner Education and Training for the Professional Practice of Psychology (1990) for the training of clinical psychologists in CUDCP programs that describe their training models as scientist-practitioner. CUDCP respects and advocates diversity and innovation in the implementation of the scientist-practitioner model." 

Approved letter to President Clinton supporting his lifting the ban on lesbians and gay men in the military, particularly as the ban affects our students receiving internship training and employment in the military.

 Minutes of the August 1993 Meeting

"We recommend that internship be required to make an explicit statement in their materials describing the research opportunities available to interns. The statement should include the internship's policy regarding (1) specific time that could be set aside by interns explicitly for research activities: (2) research opportunities and supervisors on site; (3) available of time for continuing research activities in collaboration with the home program; (4) available of support for research activities (e.g., space, computers). COA should consider the site's statement in making accreditation decisions. The student, the student's advisor, and the DCT should collaborate in selecting internships whose research opportunities fit students' research interests and needs."

 Minutes of the February 1994 Meeting 

"We support the principle that psychologists use assessments and treatments that are empirically supported and that psychologists, as scientist-practitioners, engage in research regarding the validation of assessment and treatment techniques. Specifically:

-We support efforts to collect and disseminate information regarding empirically supported assessments and interventions. This information should be updated on a frequent basis.

-Training in the use of empirically supported assessments and treatments should occur as part of the training at all levels, i.e., doctoral, internship, postdoctoral and continuing education.

-Training in the research methodology for developing and evaluating new assessment and treatment approaches should take place within all levels of training.

-Accreditation at all levels should require evidence of training in the use of empirically supported assessments and treatments, as well as training in the research skills necessary to validate new techniques.

-We recommend ongoing development of the process and criteria by which assessment and interventions will be judged. We further recommend the ongoing evaluation of the generalizability of empirically supported assessments and interventions across settings and populations.

 Voted to send a letter of nonsupport for the National College of Professional Psychology.

 Minutes of the August 1994 Meeting 

Review of new accreditation guidelines highlighted the following issues/concerns for CUDCP:

site visit chair chosen by COA

  1. random assignment of time of site visit to a particular 3 month periodselection of appeals panel as a prerogative of COA

  2. growth in list of. required competencies

  3. specific elimination of the statistics requirement

  4. accreditation of postdoctoral training programs

  5. lack of inclusion of need to teach empirically validated treatment strategies

 Minutes of the February 1995 Meeting 

"Whereas the practice of Clinical Psychology should be based on scientific knowledge; and whereas scientific knowledge at the psychological level of analysis has contributed greatly to the understanding and amelioration of human suffering; and whereas adequate training in psychological science and its application requires many years of study, and while it can prepare clinical psychologists to research drug effects, it does not provide competence for prescribing psychoactive drugs; and whereas collaboration between well-trained clinical psychologists and medical practitioners can provide responsible and effective combined treatments when medication is required; be it therefore resolved that: It is premature to extend prescription privileges to clinical psychologists." 

Minutes of the February 1997 Meeting 

  • CUDCP urges APA to make advocacy for inclusion in General Medical Education funding its highest priority (unanimously accepted). 

  • CUDCP recommends that the BEA Committee developing curricula for Level III training in prescription privileges seriously consider its development at the postdoctoral level (35 accepted; 10 rejected). 

  • CUDCP resolves that it wishes to pursue the development of internship training at the postdoctoral level for Clinical Psychologists (42 accepted; four rejected; three abstained). 

  • CUDCP resolves that it wishes ASBPP to urge state licensing boards to support the creation of rules and regulations that provide for the reasonable possibility of licensure for Clinical Psychology faculty, and that supervised hours spent in providing clinical training count as postdoctoral hours (33 accepted; two rejected; one abstained). 

Minutes of the January/February 1998 Meeting 

  • CUDCP resolves to continue full participation on the APA Committee on Accreditation for a period of 7 years (40 people voted to approve this resolution, none opposed it, one person abstained).   

  • CUDCP resolves to develop mechanisms for the systematic provision of program-specific and aggregate data about graduate doctoral programs to potential applicants and the public.  Examples of information to be included are student-faculty ratios, internship placements, student funding, post-graduate employment, etc.  This resolution was passed unanimously.   

  • CUDCP requests that faculty of its member programs who pay the APA special assessment fee be allowed to direct their monies to the directorate of their choice, so as to foster graduate education and training of scientist-practitioners.  This resolution was discussed and tabled (29 voted yes to table; 9 voted against) for additional discussion next year. 

Given our concerns with rising costs, in terms of both time and money necessary for students to be involved in the current internship interviewing process, CUDCP recommends that APPIC work with relevant organizations to develop mechanisms to mitigate these costs.  Thirty eight people voted to affirm this resolution; no one was opposed to it.

Contents